rootninja

I just read a horrendous article on a wannabe news site called “The Hollywood Reporter” where the author, Paul Bond, devastatingly butchered definitions and skipped any attempt at providing even a miniscule speck of detail from the report he sourced.  It basically looked like he strung together a bunch of single sentence paragraphs and flung them into what he describes as a news article, shockingly similar to the way an orangutan throws poo in the zoo.
http://blog.rootninja.com“>http://blog.rootninja.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/orangutan.jpg” alt=”news reporting done zoo animal dung throwing style” width=”185″ height=”199″ />
I had to post this because I completely agree with faptzu’s comment,

“This article is complete bunk pulled out of the **** of the author. Paul Bond, did you actually attempt to report anything accurately? How about you first check the age ranges of who you’re calling Millennials, Generation X, and Babyboomers.. Second, you’re saying Millennials don’t care about news and current events? How about they don’t care about the **** that’s on TV that they call ‘news’ and ‘current events.’ The Internet has the real news - after you filter out all the big media ****. I can get more news in 2 minutes on the Internet than I can in 24 hours of flipping through CNBC, MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, BBC (yes.. even the lovely BBC) combined. So many sweeping generalizations and errors in reasoning in one small article.. The author is contributing to the reasons why Millennials don’t pay attention to the ‘news.’”

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ic41d147829e712a6a6ecd990ea3a349c